What Lies Behind the Hysteria

The secret articles of Yalta-II require the Neocons’ obliteration; their demise is to be a lesson to all.

If the practice of leaking information that concerns not just the United States but also Russia, which has become a tradition in Washington in the past few years, continues, there will come a day when the media will publish leaks about the things that Washington asked us to keep secret, for example, things that happened during President Obama’s terms in office.

 – Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Maria Zakharova

Leaving aside possible information about the “More Theatre than Real Action” Tomahawk strike against an empty Syrian airbase on April 7th, 2017, what did Information Director Maria Zakharova in her March 23rd, 2017, briefing mean by this reciprocally detailed threat?

Spokesperson Zakharova cannot have been referring to leaked information concerning Michael Flynn’s brief interchange with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak (for a principled Russian response to American provocations was arrived at in Moscow, not in Trump Tower). Neither can she have been reaching back to the September 9th, 2016, deal with the Russian military in Syria. This agreement has never been revealed in detail; its successful secrecy is what triggered the infamous September 17th bombing raid that scuttled it. In the end, Zakharova chose not to describe what has been leaked or what the Russian Federation might reveal in retaliation, except to indicate that it would have to do with agreements made with the Obama Administration that the latter asked to be kept ultra-secret.

So aside from the September 9th agreement between then Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, to what secret deals might the very able Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson be referring?

There can be only three possibilities.

The first is the 2013 deal which avoided a US attack upon Syria after moderate rebels murdered (using CIA-provided poison gas from Libya) 1400 civilians in East Ghouta. The second is the May 12th, 2015, secret agreements reached in Sochi, again, between Kerry and Lavrov. The third is the much more formally occasioned “deal” finalised on or around March 25th, 2016, in Moscow between Kerry and Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin.

The true and binding articles of the latter two are what the Russian Federation must be threatening to reveal, which revelation could tumble the United States of America into political chaos.

Interestingly, in the days following Zakharova’s threat there have been no leaks of diplomatic information.

What follows was never openly admitted to in May of 2015 or in March of 2016, but its truth underlies all the negotiations of those two meetings (and probably of the September 9th meetings as well): Cold War programs such as the shock-treatment, 1990s, switch from communism to capitalism, NATO’s splintering of Yugoslavia, terrorism in the Caucasus, the Atlantic Alliance’s march east to Russia’s borders, colour revolutions, the Georgian War, and most especially the Western-organised Nazi coup in the Ukraine have all forced the Russian Federation to do the unthinkable. Its secret March 4th through 15th, 2015, strategic campaign planning conference grabbed the bull by the horns and initiated a countdown to actual nuclear war.

By April of 2015, US intelligence had correctly identified what was afoot and the Owners of America signalled to Moscow their desire to do all necessary to avoid annihilation. The resultant ‘treaty’ negotiated by John Kerry in May is known as Yalta-II.  President Donald Trump is bound by this treaty, but would like very much to renegotiate it. Trump claims a better deal can be got by him than by the Obama crowd. In fact, the President has accused his obsessed-with-Russia opponents of undermining his chances of getting more favourable terms for Yalta-II. He did this explicitly during his marathon press conference on February 16th, 2017.

Panic over the secret articles of Yalta-II explain the surveillance of Donald Trump, which is now revealed to have gone back to mid-May, 2015. Allegations of Trump connections to Russia, one will notice, began only after specifics were concretely and formally hammered out with President Putin in March of 2016. First came the rumours of Trump’s aides travelling to Moscow, people such as Flynn, Paul Manafort and Carter Page. Then the treaty’s opponents asserted that Russia had hacked the White House’s communication systems. In June, Russia was accused of stealing the Democrats’ anti-Trump research files while Trump himself was described as having business connections in Russia. July would bring the famous DNC server hack complaint, and August saw the FBI announcing that it was investigating whether Russia was behind the New York Times information thefts. In October, only weeks before election-day, the United States made an official accusation that Russia had attacked the Democratic Party and also state election systems. Hillary Clinton levelled complaints against Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin scores of times during the final months of her failed campaign. After the debacle on November 8th, President Obama ejected thirty-five Russian diplomats in retaliation for their supposed attempt to gain advantage for Trump in the lost election.

It was this ejection that formed the substance of Flynn’s phone conversation with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

It was Flynn’s resultant resignation that occasioned a seventy-seven minute long press conference in which the word “Russia” left the lips of the press and President Trump roughly once per minute. Since the mainstream media is the mouthpiece of the Neocons, this roiling, constantly resurfacing concern over a Trump Administration agreement with the Russian Federation reveals core truths lying behind the surface hysteria gripping the nation’s opinion leaders.

The Neocons, who were not privy to Yalta-II and who have been designated a prime target for destruction by that treaty, have discovered its existence and are hysterical about it. The latest antics by Senator John McCain and his chemical weapon wielding takfiris are just the latest verses of this Western/ Wall Street imperialist siren call.

Ironically, neither McCain nor Adam Schiff can come out and openly cry, “We’ve surrendered to the Russian Federation!” To do so would cause United States crimes against humanity to be laid bare before the entire world. These include aggression, terrorism, gun running, narcotics trafficking, harvesting of human organs, paedophile rings, and propaganda in furtherance of the aforesaid (if not even more nefarious wrongs).

According to sources, Yalta-II will be followed by Nuremburg-II (i.e., war crimes trials like those occurring after the Great Patriotic War).

Hence, the hysteria . . .

Despite the theatrics they’re presently engaged in (and this includes a return of the “dirty dossier” and Trump’s impeachment after testimony from Michael Flynn), the men and women responsible for American, UK, NATO and Israeli foreign policy from 1992 to the present will be arrested, set before the Hague, and tried. 

Many will wind up in jail. Some will die.

The secret articles of Yalta-II require the Neocons’ obliteration; their demise is to be a lesson to all. This explains why President Trump refuses to compromise on peace with Russia. It’s not because, as a businessman, he sees conflict as a waste and – instead – wants in on the Eurasian Economic Union bonanza. A victorious America would develop the vast spaces of Siberia on its own terms and for its own elites’ benefit. It also can’t be the result of Secretary of State Tillerson’s estimation of the costs of cold war over the last twenty-five years. As costly as it’s been, a quarter century of cold war has subsidized banks with monies laundered for international narcotics, weapons corporations with new non-competitive contracts, hedge funds with investments seeking the stability of Wall Street (as opposed to areas in chaos), and politicians with gold and oil plays. Trump’s obstinacy, lastly, cannot be the flowering of a grand American isolationism. The proponents of this creed are reviled throughout Washington, New York, and America in general. President Trump refuses to budge because he was placed in office, from the very outset, to faithfully execute the terms of Yalta-II (and thus to save the United States).

The United States requires salvation because the Neocons, in their arrogance, provoked the Russian Federation, which, since 1999, has very secretly built a military power (using EMERCOM as a blind behind which to accomplish this) that America has no chance of besting. The United States procures weapons not to accomplish missions on the battlefield, but rather to generate corporate profits. Consider the F-35. The Russian Federation, on the other hand, designs weapons that work on the battlefield, and that do so as reliably and as cheaply as possible. Just a month ago it was confirmed that the entire territory of the Russian Federation is now protected by its S-400 air defence systems. Experts agree that, once the follow-on S-500 missile batteries roll out, the airspace above Russia will be completely sealed. Parallel to this, Russia’s hypersonic nuclear warhead, Object 4202, approaches serial production well ahead of schedule (thanks to Vladimir Putin’s personal involvement). The idea is to arm Russia’s gargantuan Sarmat ICBM missiles with these warheads. It is game over once that happens: the United Kingdom can be reached within a mere thirteen minutes; the West Coast of the USA can be reached in still less time. The Sarmat and Object 4202 are also designed to outfox American anti-ballistic missiles, coming from unexpected directions and at altitudes useless to their interceptors.

Given the certainty that Russian missiles will fly (perhaps as early as 2018) a genuinely frightened American ownership class ordered the manipulation of the 2016 national election, just enough to ensure victory for Trump. Election Day proceeded as everyone expected, with Hillary Clinton maintaining a slight lead, until, suddenly, as evening deepened, several states ticked over to Trump as though via signal. Florida, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Ohio went to Trump, and, with them, the election.

The Neocons were shocked and disbelieving at first, but then the implications of their loss began to dawn. The suspect election confirmed what, previously, they had only feared – Yalta-II exists. Their elimination from the corridors of power, however, guaranteed their eventual destruction and the death of American Empire (along with its adjuncts: the EU, NATO, and Greater Israel). Without a threat of American violence, other nations – whose memories are long – have nothing to stop them from seeking revenge. China remembers America’s creation of Chiang Kai Shek (whose war caused nine million Chinese deaths) and of American perfidy in Indochina. Russia remembers that Nazi Germany was fostered by the supposedly civilised West and aimed at the USSR (to the tune of twenty-seven million dead).

According to conservative estimates the United States is responsible for the deaths of forty million innocent people in the post-World War II period. The Neocons are not stupid; they surely realize that aggrieved peoples will soon be seeking them out.

Because the Owners of America wield actual power, instead of the delegated authority that the Neocons have mistaken for power, their hysterics will come to nothing (indeed, the Russia election involvement accusation is already falling apart).

It does not matter that President Trump makes a poor public spokesman and causes upset; he will serve his full term of office. For what lies behind the hysteria is Yalta-II, the secret equal of Versailles of 1919 and the Paris Peace Treaty of 1947.